Wilkins v University Hospital North Midlands NHS Trust [1] Introduction This was a trial of a preliminary issue, namely whether a clinical negligence claim brought by the claimant Mr Wilkins
Wilkins v University Hospital North Midlands NHS Trust [1] Introduction This was a trial of a preliminary issue, namely whether a clinical negligence claim brought by the claimant Mr Wilkins
[2020] EWHC 3506 (QB) Summary of the facts The claimant was conceived in early 2001. Before conception her mother attended an appointment with the Defendant, her GP to discuss family
Sunday Post Article, 21/02/2021 Every lawyer who has listened to a client who is a victim of Transvaginal Mesh is deeply appalled by how lives can be destroyed by an
The case of Charlie Gard Introduction On 28th July 2017, 11 -month old Charlie Gard died with his parents by his side following a protracted 4 months of court hearings
Mark Harvey, the author of this post. There are generally three routes to remedy where one is alleging a product has caused an injury. The traditional negligence claim; the Consumer
It was the tragedy of thalidomide in the 1960’s that first brought to the public attention the problems faced by victims in the UK in obtaining compensation from large drug
The decision in Jones v Kaney Introduction In the decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney [1] the question was whether public policy justified conferring on an expert
Ruth Dalton v Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 832 (QB) Introduction The claimant argued that there was a negligent delay in diagnosis of her breast cancer. Fortunately,
Guest authored post On the 1st October 1999 my son, Sam Montgomery, was delivered stillborn weighing 9lb 6oz, requiring CPR and adrenaline to restore his heartbeat. During his delivery, an
Sam Montgomery was born in October 1999, but it was not until March 2015 that the Supreme Court issued its decision in the case brought against Lanarkshire Health Board. The