A series of posts on patient consent – (2) [<–Previous] “If the outcome of the trail depends exclusively or almost exclusively on a serious disagreement between distinguished and reputable experts,
A series of posts on patient consent – (2) [<–Previous] “If the outcome of the trail depends exclusively or almost exclusively on a serious disagreement between distinguished and reputable experts,
For a full analysis of this case please see the Case Review blog post. Neutral Citation: [2020] EWHC 310 (QB) Judge: Geoffrey Tattersall QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of
Neutral Citation: [2020] EWHC 1147 (QB) Judge: Mr Justice Stewart Counsel: Mr R Weir QC for the claimant, Irwin Mitchell, Solicitors Mr M Barnes for the defendants, Capsticks, Solicitors Hearing
Introduction There are specific time periods for bringing actions in court in Scottish and English law. A claimant may lose the right to obtain damages if he/she does not bring
Introduction The General Medical Council (GMC) has at long last published its new guidance on decision making and consent and this will come into effect on 9 November 2020. Their
[2020] EWCA Civ 358 Introduction This was an appeal by Dr Mario Shembri against a finding of Mr Justice Stewart [1]. Mrs Marshall had died on 26/04/2014 as a result
For a full analysis of this case please see the Case Review blog post. Neutral citation: [2020] EWHC 158 QB Judge: Andrew Lewis QC (Deputy High Court Judge) High Court
Neutral citation: n/a Judge: Clive Sheldon QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Counsel: Luka Krsljanin (instructed by Clyde & Co) for the ApplicantEmma Corkill (instructed by
Neutral citation: [2020] 1 WLUK 437 Judge: HHJ Claire Evans, County Court, Manchester Counsel: Giles Colin (instructed by Hempsons, Manchester) for the defendant trustPaul Kirtley (instructed by Slater and Gordon,
[2020] EWHC 310 (QB) This is the second post commenting on the case. The first post deals with the facts of the case and the decision of the court. Comment on causation