Sam Montgomery was born in October 1999, but it was not until March 2015 that the Supreme Court issued its decision in the case brought against Lanarkshire Health Board. The
Tag: consent
Pepper v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust – Case SummaryPepper v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust – Case Summary
For a full analysis of this case please see the Case Review blog post. Neutral Citation: [2020] EWHC 310 (QB) Judge: Geoffrey Tattersall QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of
Pepper v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (part 2)Pepper v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (part 2)
[2020] EWHC 310 (QB) This is the second post commenting on the case. The first post deals with the facts of the case and the decision of the court. Comment on causation
Pepper v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 310 (QB) – Part 1Pepper v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 310 (QB) – Part 1
EWHC 310 (QB) Introduction This is a clinical negligence action brought by Ms Pepper for damages against the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust. She alleged that Professor Malago, who
The quality of evidence of ‘normal practice’ in information disclosure cases post MontgomeryThe quality of evidence of ‘normal practice’ in information disclosure cases post Montgomery
Introduction It is the duty of the court in any case to assess the evidence of witnesses and make an assessment on whether that evidence is reliable and/or credible and
Montgomery-Whose Choice is it anyway?Montgomery-Whose Choice is it anyway?
“Autonomy, in the liberal tradition, is generally understood as self-determination: the freedom to pursue one’s conception of the good life, just as long as it does not impinge upon another’s